A class action lawsuit is pending out of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida revolving around claims that  L.A. Fitness charged members dues when they no longer were an active member of the club.  The case is entitled Joshua Vaughn v. L.A. Fitness International, LLC, and it is case number 8:11-CV-00457-SCB-AEP.  Imagine signing up for a gym membership and being told that the membership can be cancelled at any time by following the stipulations in the contract.  But then when you cancel the membership you are still charged dues as if you were visiting the club everyday.  This is what class members are claiming in the US Gym Settlement.  Like any good defendant LA Fitness does not believe it has done anything wrong, and it believes that it would ultimately prevail in this lawsuit, but has agreed to settlement terms to avoid a lengthy and costly court trial.  Class members in the case are defined as anyone who who cancelled their LA Fitness Monthly Dues Membership Agreement during the Class Period of May 18, 2006 to January 1, 2013.  The deadline to file a claim in the case is August 9, 2013 for Subclass A and B claims.  Class members will be represented by Sherrie R. Savett of Berger & Montague, P.C. 1622 Locust Street Philadelphia., PA, 19103 Telephone: 800-424-6690.

Other important dates in the lawsuit include the settlement fairness hearing which will take place on  September 19, 2013 at 1:30 p.m., the deadline to exclude yourself from the case or object to the proposed settlement which is August 9, 2013 and the Deadline to Activate 45-Day Club Access Pass to those who qualify is May 11, 2014.

The court can be reached at:

Clerk of the Court
United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
601 Market Street, Room 2609
Philadelphia, PA 19106

www.USGymSettlement.com

A class action lawsuit has been filed against QuickTrim Weight Loss System and the Kardashian sisters claiming they made inaccurate claims about the ability to lose weight when taking the Quick Trim supplement.  Class members contend that the ability to lose weight while taking the QuickTrim product was overstated if not all together a lie.  The defendants deny any actions of wrong doing but have agreed to settlement terms in order to avoid a trial by fire.  More and more class action lawsuits against producers of weight loss supplement are being seen and will surely continue to rise.  The lawsuit is entitled Teresa Anaya v. Quick Trim, LLC and is in the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino.  Other defendants in the lawsuit include retailers GNC, Drugstore.com, CVS Pharmacy, Wal-Mart and Amazon.com.  There are two settlement classes under the AnayaSupplementSettlement that include Group A, Category 1 and Group A, Category 2.  Under category 1 each class member will receive a settlement of 50% compensation of the purchase price they paid for the QuickTrim product unless they decide to accept a coupon instead.  Under category 2 a class member will receive 50% of the purchase price or a coupon which can be redeemed for a retail value equal to the full purchase price of the QuickTrim Products.  In order to qualify for any type a settlement a claim form must be filed by August 5, 2013.

Class members in the case are defined as anyone who purchased on of the following QucikTrim products between the dates of August 14, 2009 through March 1, 2013:

• Quick Trim Sugar & Carb Cheater
• Quick Trim Fast Cleanse
• QuickTrim Extreme Burn
• Quick Trim Burn & Cleanse
• Quick Trim Hot Stix
• Quick Trim Fast Shake
• Quick Trim Satisfy
• Quick Trim Celluslim

Class members will be represented by the law firm of Kabateck Brown Kellner, LLP.  QuickTrim LLC have hire the law firm of Nagel Rice, LLP.  A settlement fairness hearing will be held on 08-05-13 at the San Bernardino County Courthouse.

The U.S. Weight Loss Market is estimated to be worth over $60 billion dollars.  Any questions about the Anaya Lawsuit can be directed to: Anaya Supplement Settlement Administrator P.O. Box 2838 Portland, OR 97208-2838 or online.

www.AnayaSupplementSettlement.com

A class action lawsuit entitled Nwabueze et al. v. AT&T. et al., is pending out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California revolving around claims that AT&T purchased accounts receivables from other billers, billed its customers for third-party services, took a cut of the collected money and gave the remaining money to the original services.  AT&T denies all and any actions of wrong doing but has agreed to settlement terms in order to avoid a pricey legal battle that might drain their deep pocket books!  This is Case Number CV-09-1529 SI and class members can’t wait to get their hands on settlement payouts.  The deadline to file a claim in the class for class members is December 2, 2013 or 30 days after they receive a Billing Summary in response to a timely request, whichever is later.  All objectives or relevant comments must be in by September 2, 2013. The settlement fairness hearing will take place on November 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m..  Class members are not required to attend but may do so if they want to be heard in the case.  attthirdpartybillingsettlement.com will require the Adobe Reader program view relevant PDF court documents.  Any questions or concerns can be brought to the attention of (866) 242-0603 or by email at info@ATTthirdpartybillingsettlement.com.  Settlements class member can expect to receive the full amount of Third-Party Charges the Class Member asserts were not authorized to the extent that such payments have not previously been reimbursed under the Monetary Relief settlement class.

Class members who opt to stay in the lawsuit have been appointed the following lawyers:  Jeffrey F. Keller, John G. Jacobs, Michael W. Sobol, David Schachrnan and Michael A. Caddell.  The official address in relation to the class settlement is Settlement Administrator Nwabueze v. AT&T, Inc. c/o GCG P.O. Box 35045 Seattle, WA 98124.  A claim form can be downloaded online or a request can be made by writing to the previous address.

www.attthirdpartybillingsettlement.com

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Acer claiming that it sold laptops that did not contain enough memory to properly run the Microsoft Windows Vista  Premium operating systems.  The main problem according to the claimants was the laptop did not have enough RAM which caused the laptops to freezing, crashes, lock-ups, and other poor performance.  Many times a computer will shut down or freeze when it is lacking RAM.  No enough RAM pretty much makes playing video games impossible.  RAM is short for Random Access Memory and the more RAM a computer has the faster it works.  Acer denies all actions of wrong doing but has agreed to settlement terms.  The case is entitled Wolph v. Acer America Corp and is under the jurisdiction of the United States District Court Northern District of California.  Class members in the case are defined as anyone who purchased an Acer Notebook Computer pre-installed with Microsoft Windows Vista.  All claim forms in the lawsuit must be submitted by July 24, 2013 in order to be eligible for any settlement.  Class members who file timely claim forms may receive a cash award of between $10 and $100 or a free Flash Drive pending a settlement fairness hearing.  The fairness hearing will take place at the Courtroom 11 of the Phillip Burton Federal Building & United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102 on 10-13-2013.  Class members are not required to attend as their court appointed lawyers of Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP (Daniel L. Warshaw and Bobby Pouya) will handle all the leg work at the hearing.  AcerLawsuit.com provides more details about the settlement terms along with a help FAQ and claim form.

More information about the Acer Lawsuit can be found at the Settlement Administrator website or by writing to KCC Class Action Services, P.O. Box 43169, Providence, RI 02940-3169, or by calling toll free 1-877-761-0698.

www.AcerLawsuit.com

If you or someone you know received a dietary Ageless Male supplement from NAC Marketing Corporation between the dates of March 1, 2011 up to and including September 30, 2012 you might be a part of this class action lawsuit.  agelessmaleresettinsettlement.com provides more details about the case to include the claim form.  The Ageless Male lawsuit claim that state and consumer protection laws were violated in relation to the marketing and benefits provided and/or effectiveness of Ageless Male supplement.  Everyone is in search for the fountain of youth these days, apparently the ageless male supplement was not even close.  The defendants deny any actions of wrong doing in the case but have agrees to settle.  In order to qualify for any type of settlement a class member will have to file a claim form.  A form can be found online or by writing to Claims Processing Center, Heffler Claims Administration, P.O. Box 440, Philadelphia, PA 19105.  All claim forms in the case MUST be postmarked no later than July 14, 2013.  The case is entitled Burmeister, et al. v. NAC Marketing Company, LLC, et al., and is Case Number CIVDS1213282. The courthouse that has jurisdiction of the case will be the Superior Court of California, San Bernardino Civil Division 303 West Third Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-0210.  This court will hold a fairness hearing on June 13, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. if you wish to attend at your own expense.  It should be noted that class members are not required to attend to receive a settlement.

This will end a long battle over the Ageless Male supplement.  Many men for years have been screaming for a class action lawsuit and they finally have their wish granted.  When search Ageless Male online the second term that comes up is “Ageless Male Scam”… this is usually not a good sign for the product or its manufacturer.  It looks like thousands of men country wide will finally have their day in court.

www.AgelessMaleresettinSettlement.com

If your a resident of Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, South Dakota, or Wisconsin and were injured in automobile accident while drivers or passengers in an automobile insured by American Family between the dates of July 25, 1990 through February 25, 2013 you might be a member of the American Family Auto Insurance Medpay class action lawsuit.  The lawsuit is entitled East Washington Chiropractic, P.C., et al. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company and is in the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Madison County, Illinois.  The lawsuit claims that American Family made improperly low payments using biased computer software programs on claims submitted through its automobile Medpay coverage.  Cash payments are possible to qualifying class members who file timely claims.  The defendants in the lawsuit are defined as American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin, American Family Insurance Company, and American Standard Insurance Company of Ohio.  Class members will be represented by the following attorneys: Mr. Bradley M. Lakin, Mr. Robert W. Schmieder II, Mr. Mark L. Brown and Mr. Anthony L. Martin.  The attorneys will seek compensation no greater than $150,000 to represent the class members.  American Family denies any actions of wrong doing but has agreed to settle to avoid a lengthy court trail.  MedpayClassAction.com provides more details about the case.

A class member can request a claim form online at the Medpay Class Action class administrators website by providing their name and address.  The user can obtain the claim form by mail or download it online.

All claim forms are due no later than September 17, 2013.  A settlement fairness hearing will be held on July 19, 2013.  All objections to the American Family Auto Insurance Medpay Lawsuit Settlement must be made by June 5 2013.  All objections must be mailed to: Clerk of the Court at the following address: Clerk of the Circuit Court, Madison County Courthouse, 155 North Main Street, Edwardsville, Illinois 62025.

www.MedpayClassAction.com